Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (11)
- January 2013 (3)
- January 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- July 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (9)
- October 2008 (11)
- September 2008 (2)
- August 2008 (15)
- July 2008 (24)
- June 2008 (31)
- May 2008 (37)
- April 2008 (28)
- March 2008 (44)
- February 2008 (43)
- January 2008 (32)
- December 2007 (34)
- November 2007 (23)
- October 2007 (8)
- September 2007 (9)
- August 2007 (12)
- July 2007 (9)
- June 2007 (6)
- May 2007 (11)
- April 2007 (6)
- March 2007 (10)
- February 2007 (5)
- January 2007 (14)
- December 2006 (11)
- November 2006 (5)
- October 2006 (10)
- September 2006 (7)
- August 2006 (15)
- July 2006 (15)
- June 2006 (17)
- May 2006 (5)
- April 2006 (5)
- March 2006 (3)
- February 2006 (4)
- January 2006 (5)
- December 2005 (5)
- November 2005 (5)
- October 2005 (8)
- September 2005 (10)
- August 2005 (10)
- July 2005 (12)
- June 2005 (15)
- May 2005 (12)
- April 2005 (4)
5 comments:
His answer doesn't tell much.
I agree with him on one point that China needs to free itself. However he is almost too right for me. A Rothschild's boy.
he is intresting but seems to dance around the question and has over simplistic views on certain issues.
dont waste time on watching those non-professional argument on youtube, there are much more valuable information you can find else where. you are too adicted to youtube...
almost everything he says is very ignorant. equating marxism to fascism, saying that china lacks a constitution etc.
and what's with his definition of capitalism? i swore that capitalism, hence the name, is the economic system in which individuals or groups privately work to produce capital.
also, China split from russia during the late fifties with complete split apparent by 62.
and what is with his beating around the bush? he just kept using the same two expressions "postage stamp" and "numbers are never the final argument".
Post a Comment